AVA80037 Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic Rory Buchanan
Aviation Research Dissertation on Flight Safety 101121216
Human Factors and Pilot Proficiency
2
The undertaking of flight utilises multiple skillsets from flight crews, requiring hand-eye
coordination, instinctual response to various sensory cues, procedural knowledge, and reasoning
based on learned associations experienced through training. In addition, the conduct of a flight
operation involves a choregraphed sequence of events in a fixed order, memory flows and checklists
interspersed with briefings to ensure that all crew have a complete understanding of the
undertakings. This highly complex system is susceptible to lapses, missteps, and misapplications of
steps at the incorrect times should flight crew become slow to act or forgetful of key responses, a
scenario that becomes more likely with breaks from the action. Without recent experience, crews
can begin to experience skill fade affecting not only their manual flying skills (Ebbatson et al, 2010),
but also knowledge of procedures, aircraft systems, memory-based items, and briefings
requirements (CAA, 2021). This skill fade could lead to crews inappropriately responding to
abnormal events, failing to discuss safety relevant information in briefings, and misconfiguring the
aircraft in various stages of flight, all of which would result in reduced safety margins during critical
phases of flight.
This understanding of skill fade is reflected in the regulatory approach of many countries in how
pilots are to maintain the privileges of their licences and ratings, typically with windows in which a
minimum number of flight hours, landings, and approaches must be made. A typical example of
these windows is the International Civil Aviation Organization’s standard that pilots should not
operate an aircraft carrying passengers unless they have completed a minimum of 3 take-offs and
landings in the past 90 days when carrying passengers (ICAO, 2022), a requirement that is reflected
in the regulatory practices of aviation administration globally (FAA, 2022; CASA, 2022a; CAA, 2023).
These requirements, however, can vary dramatically based on the types of operation being
undertaken and the levels of licensing attained by flight crew (SKYbrary, n.d.), with pilots only
required, at a minimum, to fly once with an instructor every two years to maintain the privileges of
their licences (CASA, 2022b). As such, these regulatory requirements should instead only be viewed
as the bare minimum requirements without specific interventions such as recurrent training and
checking.
Further complicating the matter of flight crew performance upon return from hiatus is the possibility
of regulatory or procedural change having occurred during their absence. This may cause crews to
misapply old and no longer in force rules and regulations in the conduct of flights – or fail to conduct
newly implemented operating procedures unique to their operational environment – during periods
of high workload where they may fall back on outdated automatic behaviour. A notable example of
such regulatory change is the effort of CASA in their decades long scheme to bring the Australian air
operating rules into alignment with the United States’ Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). This
scheme seeks to streamline the regulatory framework of aviation in Australia by bringing disparate
rules and requirements within the fold of a single set of regulations, the Civil Aviation Safety
Regulations (CASRs). Whilst this evolution has been ongoing since 1998, a major milestone was
reached in December 2021 with the implementation of the general flight operating rules (CASA,
n.d.). With this change, new requirements on the conduct of certain operations were introduced as
well as there being a general refinement and simplification of existing rules. Taking place during the
Covid-19 pandemic in Australia, these rules came into effect just as the two largest states in
Australia were emerging from lockdowns that had significantly curtailed aviation. Flight crew
returning to flight in this post-lockdown recovery would thus have to both refamiliarize themselves
with the task of flight operations as well as come to grips with these new rules in certain situations
supplanting established patterns of behaviour.
Another example of changes occurring during a hiatus could be the introduction of new aircraft to an
airline fleet necessitating a change in standard operating procedure to encompass the new aspects
of operation. An airline introducing a variant of an existing aircraft type with different capabilities or
instruments may require that all flight crew on the entire fleet type be retrained, and without the